/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say: | Presumably you meant p:ignored-prefixes="exc". . . | | Three further clarifications: | | 1) Are we calling it ignored-prefixes, or extension-prefixes? We're currently calling it ignored-prefixes, I think, though now that we have p:doc, I think I'd be in favor of changing its name. | 2) Can we just follow XSLT's lead and only allow it on p:pipeline and | p:pipeline-library?, (oh yes, and it doesn't need to be a qname in | that case anymore, right?) XSLT allows it anywhere, without a prefix on a name in the XSLT namespace and with one on other elements. I was going for simplicity and just always putting it in a namespace. | 3) p:doc is allowed almost anywhere except inside p:inline, right? Basically. I haven't tried to write that bit yet. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 15:59:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT