- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:59:15 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 15:59:36 UTC
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Presumably you meant p:ignored-prefixes="exc". . .
|
| Three further clarifications:
|
| 1) Are we calling it ignored-prefixes, or extension-prefixes?
We're currently calling it ignored-prefixes, I think, though now that
we have p:doc, I think I'd be in favor of changing its name.
| 2) Can we just follow XSLT's lead and only allow it on p:pipeline and
| p:pipeline-library?, (oh yes, and it doesn't need to be a qname in
| that case anymore, right?)
XSLT allows it anywhere, without a prefix on a name in the XSLT namespace
and with one on other elements.
I was going for simplicity and just always putting it in a namespace.
| 3) p:doc is allowed almost anywhere except inside p:inline, right?
Basically. I haven't tried to write that bit yet.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 15:59:36 UTC