W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Extension element

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:55:31 +0000
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bps6y8zdo.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Presumably you meant p:ignored-prefixes="exc". . .

Three further clarifications:

 1) Are we calling it ignored-prefixes, or extension-prefixes?
 2) Can we just follow XSLT's lead and only allow it on p:pipeline and
    p:pipeline-library?, (oh yes, and it doesn't need to be a qname in
    that case anymore, right?)
 3) p:doc is allowed almost anywhere except inside p:inline, right?

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGBTvjkjnJixAXWBoRAtPbAJ9CdWrubK2trHOQNTbXAYIAueQgLACfZFAb
mLCy9+SrDHyhGlyHfsZzPr4=
=9GDI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 14:55:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT