W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Standard components

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:52:21 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87y7lpz5y2.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
| 1.8 Serialize / 1.9 Parse
|>   Do we really need these?
| Yes, yes, yes.

No, no, no.

And if we must, then surely the semantics has to be that the *entire*
document is escaped and returned in a new wrapper:




| 2.2 RELAX NG Validate
|>   I wonder if we need an option to enable annotations and data typing?
| If there are options, let's enumerate them.  I didn't put any on it because
| I'm
| not a Relax NG expert.

Yeah, I need to think about that one a bit.

| 2.3 XInclude From Sequence
|>   Barf. I want to solve this problem in a more general way
| OK.   Let's discuss that.

On the list.

| 3.3 Label Elements
|>   How does the component garauntee that it doesn't introduce duplicate
|> IDs?
| Well... it sees the whole document, right ?

So it doesn't stream, it buffers the whole thing. Fine, but it has to
say that. Or it should say that it streams and uses a particular
pattern for generating IDs and if you get dups, the component fails.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:52:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:42 UTC