- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:25:28 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 7/20/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | Furthermore, I think that @select would become VERY interesting in the
> | future when we potentially would allow more that just strings....
>
> No matter what we allow in the future, the value of the select
> attribute will always be just a string. I don't see any future in
> which select="anyexpr" is different from value="{anyexpr}"?
> Well, not any XML future anyway :-)
That's why I spoke about that
I hope that some day we will need to make @select return anything else
than a string and we will need @select because @value would be useless
>
> | So, I agree AVT are nice, but I'm not in favor of making @select
> | deprecated in any way
>
> We agreed yesterday not to do AVTs for the Last Call draft. I suppose
> we could be persuaded by last call comments to change our minds.
I just say it was nice, not necessary !
Mohamed
--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 21:25:31 UTC