- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:31:38 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 7/17/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt> was heard to say: > > | A.2.5 "The XSL Formatter step receives an XSL FO document and renders > | the content." --> into what format? PDF, SVG, PNG... ? Is it > | implementation defined, or should we say something about it? If more > | than one render format is explicitly allowed, how do we specify it? > | File extension, a "format" option, etc. > > I think Alex addressed this with the output option. I think we should > make PDF the default. I'm not comfortable making PDF the default but I won't lay down in front of a train against it. I'm really not sure there is a default that makes sense for all FO implementations. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 15:31:42 UTC