- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:08:03 +0100
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Alex Milowski wrote: > On 7/15/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Do we give a way to get the output on message of an xslt step ? > > No, but that's an interesting idea. > > We'd have to make it into XML first. > > Since many transformations do not use xsl:message, that output > would often be empty. > > I'm not sure I really want to add an extra output port for this but I > could be convinced otherwise. I *think* that XSLT messages should go on the error port. I don't think you can get at those messages (in order to save them to a file, say) unless the step actually fails (which it would do if xsl:message had terminate="yes", but not if it didn't). Perhaps the document on the error output port gets put somewhere implementation-defined when the pipeline completes, if the pipeline hasn't failed. Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2007 19:08:05 UTC