Re: Do we need port="*" anymore?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> Declare-step says that one input can have port="*" to accept an
> arbitrary number of inputs and one output can have port="*" to produce
> an arbitrary number of outputs.
>
> Since we switched to the element syntax for input bindings, I don't
> think we need port="*" on inputs anymore. And since we now forbid
> p:output from appearing in atomic steps, I don't think there's any
> value in port="*" on outputs either.

I think we can lose these for v1, yes.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGi5hmkjnJixAXWBoRAkLJAJ9Z3WGu9ifVoIg42iX6mLTglcMKuQCeKMfu
4xAYFalMtWPqVCoaPjiPjCM=
=i4FU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----