W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: A consequence of <p:xslt>

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:00:03 -0800
Message-ID: <28d56ece0702221400u66c40770wf54f247fdf4ddee6@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 2/22/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
>
> A few meetings ago, we decided that the names of steps would be
> NCNames. I don't think that works anymore.


I don't remember that.

The current specification says QName for pipeline names and step
names.


If I run XSLT with
>
>   <p:xslt>
>
> presumably if I import a pipeline library that contains a pipeline
> named "FormatDocBook", I run that pipeline using the new syntax with:
>
>   <FormatDocBook>
>
> Except that I probably want to put that in a namespace so that my
> DocBook formatting can be distinguished from yours:
>
>   <norm:FormatDocBook>
>
> but now I need to write
>
>   <p:pipeline name="norm:FormatDocBook">
>
> in the pipeline library.
>
> Or have I missed something?


Hmm... if we changed that, that was the wrong decision regardless
of this recent decision to use type names as step element names.

...but that's my opinion...



-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 22:00:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT