W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

RE: Last call draft?

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:41:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302084B5B77@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

I will have to miss next week's telcon.

Andrew Fang should be able to represent PTC/Arbortext,
but if he is absent, proxy to the chair.

I'm fine with going to Last Call.

paul
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On 
> Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Friday, 2007 August 03 11:39
> To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Last call draft?
> 
> Ok, folks, I think I've addressed all the comments. I know that Alex
> still has a couple of open actions, but other than that, are we at
> Last Call?
> 
> Please review
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html
> 
> and tell me. FWIW, I've updated the diff against the last public WD.
> 
> I don't think I made any changes not discussed in email, save one. I
> moved the err:errors/err:error elements into the c: namespace. We
> don't really need a third just for errors, do we? Seems like overkill.
> 
> The only issue that I still feel may be open is the question of
> computing the namespace bindings used to evaluate options and
> parameters.
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> -- 
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I often marvel that while each man
> http://nwalsh.com/            | loves himself more than 
> anyone else, he
>                               | sets less value on his own estimate
>                               | than on the opinions of 
> others.--Marcus
>                               | Aurelius
> 
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 16:44:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT