W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Output of p:validate-xml-schema

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:56:45 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87zm18ligy.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Dear,
|
| We say everywhere that what flows between steps is Infosets
|
| But for p:validate-xml-schema, there is a reference to PSVI
| annotations (please add a reference) "if the pipeline implementation
| supports such annotations"

Ok.

| Can we in the current spec, reference such "if"/"may" such that we can
| have a summary of what the spec suggest as extended implementation

I added that to the set of implementation-defined features, I think that's
the best way to mark these.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As we grow older we grow both more
http://nwalsh.com/            | foolish and wiser at the same time.--La
                              | Rochefoucauld

Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 15:57:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT