W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Validation in general

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:15:44 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <871wi1x2hb.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
| On 4/30/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
|>
|>
|> Dear,
|>
|> We already have p:validate-xml-schema and p:validate-relax-ng
|>
|> It seems we still miss at least two of existing more or less
|> widespread technology :
|> * p:validate-schematron
|
| I think we don't have a schematron step for the same reason we don't
| have a p:tagsoup or p:tidy for cleaning up HTML.  They are open-source
| projects and not specifications.

*Snort* Schematron is an ISO spec, Alex: http://www.dsdl.org/0524.pdf

| * p:nvdl
|
| I had thought the NVDL folks were hoping to implement NVDL as an
| XML pipeline.  Is there a final spec for NVDL ?  If not, I think we need
| to wait for one before we can put it into our spec.

See http://www.nvdl.org/. That's also in the process of becoming an
ISO Standard.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If man were never to fade away like the
http://nwalsh.com/            | dews of Adashino, never to vanish like
                              | the smoke over Toribeyama, but lingered
                              | on forever in the world, how things
                              | would lose their power to move us! The
                              | most precious thing in life is its
                              | uncertainty.--Yoshida Kenko

Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 16:15:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT