W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: p:catalog

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:10:37 -0700
Message-ID: <4828ceec0704111410l61ff8178k760493eb21a0c98d@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 4/5/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote:
> > So what is the difference with Catalog then ?
>
> While caching has been declared dead, this is a great solution
> for a user of a pipeline in that they can run two separate pipelines.
> One produces a set of documents that are put into the catalog
> or cache and the second uses that cache via an implementation
> defined feature.

Would someone provide a reference to a description of the Catalog
feature discussed here?

In an off-line discussion with Mohamed, he mentioned the related
proposal he made a few days ago. For a number of reasons, I don't feel
comfortable with the idea of systematically intercepting components
writing to a URI to making that content available to other components
in the same pipeline under the same URI. However, I feel much more
comfortable with the idea of explicitly mapping a URI to a
pipe/document/inline for a specific step. And I don't have any problem
if support for this feature is component and implementation dependent.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Apr/0002.html

Alex
-- 
Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise
http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 21:10:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT