- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:58:27 +0200
- To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Dear, The idea behind this is to provide a mechanism to overload in the context of XProc the resolution of URI So what is the difference with Catalog then ? The big difference is that it have access to *two* more extensions : * Access to inline document (which could be handy) * Access to port without needing to serialize them What are the use cases : XSLT:import and XSLT:include XInclude File Entities (I hear some people screaming...but that's a *real* use case) Schema:import and Schema:include and Schema:redefine I think the idea is to scope that p:catalog the inner of what it is defined (p:group, p:step, ...) Any thought ? Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 15:58:35 UTC