- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:53:43 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
This is quite a thread! Instead of answering individual messages, here is a reaction to some of the comments in this thread: 1) I agree with Norm's proposal that using declare-input/declare-output/input/output is a better option than input/output/with-input/with-output. 2) On the issue of naming steps vs. naming outputs, my preference is still for the latter. My rational was exposed here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jun/0037.html 3) I agree with Jeni who is saying that <p:for-each> and <p:choose> don't need to be self contained and that we should allow references to names declared elsewhere in the pipeline. Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 01:53:47 UTC