W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2006

Re: p:pipeline

From: Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:17:02 +0100
Message-ID: <44C6520E.7070300@di.fc.ul.pt>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Jeni Tennison wrote:
> But just because XSLT gives users that choice doesn't mean that XProc 
> should. I'm very happy if all XProc documents have to have <p:pipelines> 
> (or whatever) as their document root. I'm fairly happy if there's a 
> choice. I'm just not happy if I have to put each pipeline definition in 
> a separate file.

I'm conviced. As long as it will be clear that the two roots have 
different semantics, I will not be against it.


Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 17:17:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC