- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:10:47 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Alessandro Vernet wrote: > How is that? One could argue that it is better to use the 'name' > attribute to reference the name defined by components, both for > <p:input> and <p:output>. Hence, another attribute would be used to > define a "label" that can then be referenced in other places with the > "from" attribute. This would lead us to: > > <p:step kind="p:xslt"> > <p:input name="input" from="decomposition-computed"/> > <p:input name="stylesheet">in-line stylesheet</p:input> > <p:output name="output" label="gap-formulate-request"/> > </p:step> I'm using 'name' consistently where you are using 'label' and 'from' where you are using 'name'. If had to compromise, I'd use 'label' and 'from' and never use 'name'. Rational? 'label' and 'from' have some kind verb or action semantic associated with them. --Alex Milowski
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 03:17:52 UTC