W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Use Case 5.27: Integrate Computation Components (MathML)

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:10:47 -0700
Message-ID: <44B5B9B7.7030305@milowski.org>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

Alessandro Vernet wrote:
> How is that? One could argue that it is better to use the 'name'
> attribute to reference the name defined by components, both for
> <p:input> and <p:output>. Hence, another attribute would be used to
> define a "label" that can then be referenced in other places with the
> "from" attribute. This would lead us to:
> <p:step kind="p:xslt">
>    <p:input name="input" from="decomposition-computed"/>
>    <p:input name="stylesheet">in-line stylesheet</p:input>
>    <p:output name="output" label="gap-formulate-request"/>
> </p:step>

I'm using 'name' consistently where you are using 'label' and
'from' where you are using 'name'.

If had to compromise, I'd use 'label' and 'from' and never
use 'name'.  Rational?  'label' and 'from' have some kind
verb or action semantic associated with them.

--Alex Milowski
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 03:17:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC