W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Use Case 5.29: Large Document Subtree Iteration

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:54:32 +0100
To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bmzbls953.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex Milowski writes:


>    <p:input name="large-doc"/>
>    <p:output name="result" from="final"/>
>
>    <p:for-each select="section" over="large-doc" to="iteration">
>       <p:output name="final"/>

Why over == input an attribute, but output an element?

>       <p:pipe>
>          <p:input name="iteration"/>
>          <p:output name="section-transformed"/>

Who consumes this?  I.e. where's the connection from this to 'final'?

>          <p:step kind="p:xmlbase"/>
>          <p:step kind="p:xinclude"/>
>          <p:step kind="p:xslt">
>             <p:input name="stylesheet" href="section2xhtml.xsl"/>
>          </p:step>
>       </p:pipe>
>    </p:for-each>
>
> </p:pipeline>

Otherwise, this seems v. close to what I would have, except for what 
I said before, that <pipe> seems unnecessary here.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEroO4kjnJixAXWBoRAhuXAJ9ANz+QWY3TVozycqiEPQdhkssE7wCffJ3n
GaYBbBlQ6n94LJgkG0K5yC0=
=gfpd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 7 July 2006 15:54:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:48 GMT