W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Re: Combined draft

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:25:16 -0800
Message-ID: <4828ceec0612210725k5bff2995w50d88fb07ff274cf@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 12/21/06, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> Worse.  Makes the first pass through the document grind to a halt at
> the first component.  The good thing about the non-combined format,
> that you can read it quickly through section 3 and get a sense of the
> language, is lost.

I guess it depends how your brain is wired. To get a feel of what a
new language is about, I tend to look at the examples and the syntax
first. With what we have right now, this means starting at section

> Compromise suggestion:  include _one_ _short_ example of the the XML
> representation at the end of each subsection of the current
> (non-combined) format's section 3.

I will take the compromise you suggest as an improvement over what we
have now. But still prefers Norm's combined version.

Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 15:25:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:41 UTC