W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > March 2009

Re: c:multipart/@boundary

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:29:10 +0100
Message-ID: <ebaca5bf0903121029i5ceb7094p578fe51a5c86ab9b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

2009/3/11 Norman Walsh wrote:

> Providing the boundary in the response makes it possible to use that
> response in a subsequent request without having to guess a plausible
> boundary string.

  Yes you're right.  I figured that out in the meanwhile.

  Thanks for the follow up, regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:29:50 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com: "RE: p:unescape-markup - changing the namespace URI"
Previous message: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: Reading p:log output"
In reply to: Norman Walsh: "Re: c:multipart/@boundary"
Next in thread: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: c:multipart/@boundary"
Reply: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: c:multipart/@boundary"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:29:51 GMT