W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > March 2009

Re: c:multipart/@boundary

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:00:04 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m23adkndnf.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:
>   But the section does define the element for both request and
> response, and I guess the attribute is required only for requests.
> Actually, I think it should be required in requests, and forbidden in
> responses.  At least, I don't see what possibly could be its purpose
> in a response.

Providing the boundary in the response makes it possible to use that
response in a subsequent request without having to guess a plausible
boundary string.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man is not necessarily intelligent
http://nwalsh.com/            | because he has plenty of ideas, any
                              | more than he is a good general because
                              | he has plenty of soldiers.-- Chamfort

Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:00:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC