W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > July 2009

RE: err:XD0002 vs. err:XD0011 vs. err:XD0029

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:23:15 -0400
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7871055E58D@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
> I don't think its as simple as removing err:XD0002, there could be
> some rationalization across all three but I don't have spare cycles to
> suggest how.

I had the same feeling (err:XD0002 is not really a subset of err:XD0011
and err:XD0029 in the strictest sense), but I am just not sure whether
we want to go into such a level of detail in the spec. I don't think the
spec does that for other errors (XPath-related errors come to mind).

Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 10:24:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:27 UTC