W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources

From: David A. Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:58:50 -0500
Message-ID: <34A5DBC65082428A892B93CD6E89E4E2@calldei.com>
To: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>, <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>

Should a requirement, or perhaps a suggestion, be that an xproc 
implementation
validate the xproc document using one of the published schemas ?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:57 AM
Subject: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources



Hi all,

What should happen if I pass this document to an XProc processor as the
pipeline source:

<foo/>

Do we need a static error for this ("Not an XProc pipeline"), or is the
behavior of the processor implementation-defined in this case?

Personally, I think we could have a static error for the case when the
document element of the pipeline document (or the target of p:import) is
not in the XProc namespace.

Regards,
Vojtech
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 11:59:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 January 2009 11:59:42 GMT