"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > The term is used twice in the CR, first in 2.5 > > Nowhere is there a definition. Thanks. That was a typo for 'subpipeline'. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | You look wise. Pray correct that http://nwalsh.com/ | error.--Charles LambReceived on Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:43:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:43:52 GMT