W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [closed] Re: HTTP "related protocols?"

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:37:26 +0100
Message-ID: <ebaca5bf0902050537q6b22c8bdi50d21acf0e70e6af@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org


2009/2/5 Norman Walsh wrote:

> Please let us know if you're not satisfied by this explanation.

  Yes I am.  Giving implementers some room to do what's right has been
proved helpful I think.  Thanks for the response,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:38:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: sub-pipeline"
Previous message: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: multipart/@boundary"
In reply to: Norman Walsh: "[closed] Re: HTTP "related protocols?""

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:38:13 GMT