W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [closed] Re: 2.7 XPath Extension Functions

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:16:32 +0000
Message-ID: <711a73df0902050516s339617b7r1a0005796ae270f2@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

2009/2/5 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>:
> "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
>> States
>> The XProc processor must support a few additional functions in XPath
>> expressions evaluated by the processor.
>> Suggest
>> An XProc implementation must support additional functions in XPath
>> expressions as defined in this section.
> No, I don't like that. It suggests, to me, that there's some special
> constraint on implementations not otherwise imposed on processors.
> The processor is what must support the additional functions.

In which case be explicit about 'a few', i.e. which additional functions
must be supported?

That was the intent of my comment Norm? Just clarity.


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:17:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC