- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:41:17 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:41:58 UTC
Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:
> Stricto sensu, that cannot be a QName for real, as this is in
> content.
XProc says explicitly that the content values that are lexically
QNames must be valid QNames with respect to the in-scope namespaces on
the element on which they occur.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There might very well be nothing; nor
http://nwalsh.com/ | anyone. No one to notice that there is
| nothing, and to consider that natural.
| But that there is something, and,
| whatever it may be, the strange thing!
| I shall never cease being amazed at
| this.--André Gide
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:41:58 UTC