W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2009

[closed] Re: Editorial. Section 2 note

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:59:57 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2hc0wts76.fsf@nwalsh.com> 
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> Note
>
> User-defined pipelines (identified with pfx:user-pipeline in the
> preceding syntax summary) are atomic. A pipeline declaration may
> contain a subpipeline, but the invocation of that pipeline does not.
>
> Does not what?
>
> Does not contain a pipeline? Can an invocation contain anything?
>
> Clarification please

Fixed, I believe:

  User-defined pipelines (identified with pfx:user-pipeline in the
  preceding syntax summary) are atomic. A pipeline declaration may
  contain a subpipeline, but the invocation of that pipeline is atomic
  and does not contain a subpipeline.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To create a little flower is the labour
http://nwalsh.com/            | of ages.-- Blake
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 16:00:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 April 2009 16:00:40 GMT