[closed] Re: 2.6 Clarification

"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:

> Currently reads
>
> If an xpath-version is specified on a p:pipeline or p:declare-step,
> then that is the version of XPath that the step uses. If it does not
> specify a version, but a version is specified on one of its ancestors,
> the nearest ancestor version specified is the version that it uses.
>
> Should that be 'that the step must use'? I.e. the xpath-version
> specifies the required version
>
> 'that the step uses' reads as a fact, rather than a requirement?
>
> Ditto at the end of the sentence.

Yes, I changed that to "requires" which I think reads better. Let me
know if you disagree.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | So, are you working on finding that bug
http://nwalsh.com/            | now, or are you leaving it until later?
                              | Yes.