yes, yes and yes this is definitely a static error to be always reported Xmlizer On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Consider the following pipeline: > > <p:declare-step name="main" ...> > <p:input port="source"/> > <p:output port="source"/> > > <p:declare-step type="px:unused"> > <p:input port="source"/> > <p:output port="source"/> > <px:undeclared/> > </p:declarestep> > > <p:identity/> > </p:declare-step> > > (a) Does this pipeline contain an error? > (b) Are implementations allowed to report it? > (c) Are implementations required to report it? > > I think the answer to (a) is yes. I think the answers to (b) and (c) > should either both be yes or both be no, for interoperability reasons. > I'm inclined towards yes, but I'm not sure the spec gives a definitive > answer. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I'm NOT in denial! > http://nwalsh.com/ | >Received on Thursday, 9 October 2008 12:21:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 October 2008 12:21:11 GMT