Consider the following pipeline: <p:declare-step name="main" ...> <p:input port="source"/> <p:output port="source"/> <p:declare-step type="px:unused"> <p:input port="source"/> <p:output port="source"/> <px:undeclared/> </p:declarestep> <p:identity/> </p:declare-step> (a) Does this pipeline contain an error? (b) Are implementations allowed to report it? (c) Are implementations required to report it? I think the answer to (a) is yes. I think the answers to (b) and (c) should either both be yes or both be no, for interoperability reasons. I'm inclined towards yes, but I'm not sure the spec gives a definitive answer. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I'm NOT in denial! http://nwalsh.com/ |Received on Thursday, 9 October 2008 12:15:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 October 2008 12:15:46 GMT