Re: Our algorithm for anonymous step names doesn't work

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes:
>> whats the impact of considering importing more then one anonymous
>> pipeline a static error ?
>
> It's not an error at all. They don't have to have names, they have to
> have types. It just happens to be that they *can* have names.
>

yes, I was thinking anonymous pipeline was secret codeword for a step
with no name and no type ;)

> In fact, you can't refer to them by name, so maybe all we need to do
> is finesse the scoping rules a little bit.
>

this is how its most likely actually handled at the app layer ... so I
think this is the right place to adjust.


J

>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One stops being a child when one
> http://nwalsh.com/            | realizes that telling one's trouble
>                              | does not make it better.--Cesare Pavese
>