/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say: | I have change my mind on this ... I'm going to close it then :-) | mostly to do with implementation limitation; | | e.g. an informal survey of popular computing language error mechanisms | shows that there is an incredible variability in error output format | ... as well as limited control either as a constraint imposed by | language designers or differences as imagined by language | processor/compiler implementators. | | oddly formated plaintext error output has always interfered in making | unit testing reports nicer ... also I would have thought that a | standard standard error output XML vocabulary would be a no brainer in | software development, anyone know of anything with any traction out | there? | | cheers, Jim Fuller Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If today was a fish, I'd throw it back http://nwalsh.com/ | in.Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 15:11:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC