W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:04:31 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2odb9dbo0.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Toman_Vojtech@emc.com was heard to say:
| In other words, can a non-parameter input/output port contain a pipe
| binding to a parameter input port?

Yes, ordinary steps can bind to parameter input ports just as if they
were ordinary input ports.

| I guess this is not allowed, because
| otherwise there would be no need for the p:parameters step. But does the
| specification mention this somehere?

The p:parameters step is necessary in order to combine several
computed parameters together.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Before doing someone a favour, make
http://nwalsh.com/            | sure that he isn't a madman.--Eugéne
                              | Labiche

Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 18:04:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC