[closed] Re: Standard (ECMAScript) interface for invoking XProc

/ Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I don't think XProc should repeat this same mistake. The WG should embrace
| the fact XProc MAY be implemented on the client side (though I guess that
| browser vendors won't be particularly encouraged for that) and create
| another specification (or contact the Web API WG... I'm not sure how things
| are made around W3C) that defines a standard API for invoking XProc
| pipelines.

The WG has decided that it does not wish to pursue the question of APIs
at this level. At least not at this time.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A polar bear is just another way of
http://nwalsh.com/            | expressing a rectangular bear.