W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > December 2008

Re: 3.2 inaccuracy?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:24:36 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2lju9b7jv.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:

> "The scope of option and variable names is determined by where they
> are declared. When an option is declared with p:option (or a variable
> with p:variable), unless otherwise specified, its scope consists of
> the sibling elements that follow its declaration and the descendants
> of those siblings."
> 'sibling elements that follow'?  Should that be following::sibling
> then, or is 'siblings' meant as per xslt?
> Currently  confusing?

Yes, sibling elements that follow would be following-sibling::* but we
don't need to express it in XSLT terms.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Some circumstantial evidence is very
http://nwalsh.com/            | strong, as when you find a trout in the
                              | milk.--Henry David Thoreau

Received on Sunday, 21 December 2008 20:25:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:26 UTC