"Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes: >> Sure, you can do that. > >> <p:declare-step type="px:my-extension" >> px:class="org.xproc.extensions.MyExtension"> >> <p:input port="source"/> >> <p:output port="result"/> >> </p:declare-step> > > So the the interface is in XProc, while a processor implementation > can decide where it take the step implementation, right? Sounds > great! Right. If you put a subpipeline in a declare-step, then that's what it does. If you don't, then the processor has to know how to do it, but it can implement it any way it wants. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A moment's insight is sometimes worth a http://nwalsh.com/ | life's experience.--Oliver Wendell | HolmesReceived on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 14:18:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 August 2008 14:18:44 GMT