I think its important to make a distinction between text encryption and xml encryption ... conflating everything into a single p:encrypt is probably a mistake so I propose; <p:encrypt/> and <p:decrypt/> and <p:xml-encryption/> and <p:xml-decryption/> ... I am unsure about the adoption of xml encryption, perhaps its a slow burn and we should see more and more usage over time ... don't know, but I do know how it works and did some significant work with it a few years back. If you would like I can try and come up with a signature for all these steps ? cheers, JimReceived on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 07:59:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 August 2008 07:59:00 GMT