W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2008

[closed] Re: empty document node or undefined

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:58:53 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m28wzc5sfm.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| For after the next draft, I think we should consider the cases where
| we say that the context node is an empty document node. If XPath 2.0
| is being used, I think we should probably say the context node is
| undefined instead. But keep it an empty document node for XPath 1.0.

We're doing it for the next draft after all. Decided 17 Apr 2008.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The only thing that makes life possible
http://nwalsh.com/            | is permanent, intolerable uncertainty;
                              | not knowing what comes next.--Ursula K.
                              | LeGuin

Received on Thursday, 17 April 2008 16:59:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 April 2008 16:59:27 GMT