Re: shaping up Xproc unit test thoughts

On 12/06/07, James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like to have multiple asserts in a single test...the test
> being analogous to a step
>
> i conflated everything (as usual)
>
> when testing for equivelence between the output of a pipeline (an
> input in t:test) it needs to be compared to an expected xml
> document....for other assertions like xpath or some true/false type
> things we wont need expected input (or we can...but it would be easier
> to define an option....but perhaps we just have a value attribute on
> the assert.
>

What's your definition of equivalent James?

Something like xml signature?

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 10:11:11 UTC