W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > April 2007

Re: xproc http output ports? also, a good list for xproc discussion?

From: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:59:18 +0200
Message-ID: <3bb44c6e0704160559u62291715x11314f6922733bd4@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

Hi,
I managed to solve my problem with the http components part of XProc,
I had been wondering how a pipeline would do a post and processing the
response in the pipeline, being able to do so seems like a pipeline
becomes a very powerful component for doing REST based webservices.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On 4/16/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> / bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | last night I had a good idea for integrating a couple tools I
> | developed into an XML Pipeline if the pipeline took posts to http
> | output ports,
>
> I'm not sure I understand. Certainly your web server could be
> configured to run an XProc pipeline when a post arrived, but I'm not
> sure how otherwise you could arrange for a post to be delivered into a
> pipeline.
>
> | I have cc'ed this question to the xml-processing-model-comments list
> | because it may be useful in the next version of the specification.
>
> I trimmed off the CC to 'xml-dev'. That seemed like a cross-posting
> that was likely to be confusing.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 12:59:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT