Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 10:27 -0500, Norman Walsh a écrit : > > I can see the arguments in favor of xmlid, but I still prefer xml:id. A benefit of using xml:id is that after having updated the schema that defines the XML namespace to specify that xml:id has a type xs:ID, any application that relies on this schema would support xml:id without requiring any update. I don't know how many software do behave that way, but this seems like a worthy benefit! Eric -- Freelance consulting and training. http://dyomedea.com/english/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 15:42:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:38 GMT