W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-id@w3.org > August 2005

Re: again, canonicalization, and adoption

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:50:39 +0100
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@ptc.com>, "'Webb Roberts'" <webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu>, Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM, public-xml-id@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b4q9dqdy8.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Elliotte Harold writes:

> Worth noting: you don't have this problem if you only do whole
> document canonicalization.

I think it's important to emphasise this point - it reduces the
'at risk' situations considerably.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFDDtffkjnJixAXWBoRAiIgAJiDMfP22Xx7QO2+ioA4GME5Ak8eAJ9ifiA9
sW0pOe8Rx/HJaFCmcmCZ9w==
=DVdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 08:51:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:39 GMT