W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-er@w3.org > March 2012

Re: tag name state

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:22:43 +0100
Cc: "public-xml-er@w3.org Community Group" <public-xml-er@w3.org>, "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Message-Id: <0E030C4C-6546-4CD6-BE7F-54CBB3388856@berjon.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
On Mar 2, 2012, at 12:29 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:34:35 +0100, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
>> _If_ we are going to differ from HTML5 at this point I think I would go
>> further. We have a hard requirement I think that any tree have a
>> serialisation as namespace well formed XML.
> 
> Is that really a hard requirement? As I understand it EXI goes beyond that

EXI certainly goes beyond that, the XML Data Model in fact has plenty of instances that aren't serialisable to XML.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Coming up soon: I'm teaching a W3C online course on Mobile Web Apps
http://www.w3devcampus.com/writing-great-web-applications-for-mobile/
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 13:23:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 March 2012 13:23:12 GMT