W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-er@w3.org > February 2012

Re: David's less simple example

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:30:49 +0100
To: "Innovimax W3C" <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>, "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Cc: "public-xml-er@w3.org Community Group" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.waedhnnh64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:25:58 +0100, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>  
wrote:
> On 28/02/2012 16:09, Innovimax W3C wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> It looks like XML5 gives a slightly different result
>
> As predicted, this example is likely to get different results on
> different systems:-)

It's the same actually. If you applied HTML's XML coercion rules to the  
XML5 output that is. Or rather, if you did not use HTML's XML coercion  
rules it would be the same. Tokenization of HTML and XML-ER are pretty  
close.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:31:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:31:54 GMT