W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-er@w3.org > February 2012

Re: David's less simple example

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:25:58 +0000
Message-ID: <4F4D0016.1010705@nag.co.uk>
To: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-xml-er@w3.org Community Group" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
On 28/02/2012 16:09, Innovimax W3C wrote:
> David,
>
> It looks like XML5 gives a slightly different result

As predicted, this example is likely to get different results on
different systems:-)

I think a useful property to aim for (which might
conflict in edge cases with the property of following html5) is that the
resulting tree always corresponds to well formed XML. Thus XML rules may
impact on the element name fix up in ways that don't apply to a system
that is just aiming to get a DOM tree (which has more relaxed naming rules).

David



________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:26:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:26:36 GMT