- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:39:31 -0500
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- CC: W3C XML-ER Community Group <public-xml-er@w3.org>
On 2/27/2012 3:09 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote: > Therefore, I propose that we do both. Further, I'm happy to edit the > declarative-style specification unless there's someone else who wants to > do it. Are there any objections to that as a way forward? I've been thinking the same thing, but have been reluctant to propose it because I don't think I have the time to take the lead in editing. At the very least, translating the state-transition formulation into something else more declarative, or failing that perhaps functional, seems to me a good exercise in making sure we've understood the behavior of the former. I'm not sure how much time I can commit, but I'd be glad to try and help out at least informally. Thank you! Noah
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 20:39:56 UTC