W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-er@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Intent of ER-XML

From: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:25:38 -0800
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
CC: "public-xml-er@w3.org" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6FA93347-6922-4438-9C97-ADEE364DDFD5@marklogic.com>



My own answer would be any of those. (I'd rather my car engine computer
didn't come to a hard stop on the motorway just because someone
mis-entered something:-)


Not me
Sometimes a false positive is worse.
I,d rather my car stopped on error then go to 200 and disable the breaks by misparsing a bad input and assuming its what I wanted.

-david lee

Sent from my iPad (excuse the terseness)
David A Lee
dlee@calldei.com<mailto:dlee@calldei.com>

Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 03:26:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 February 2012 03:26:03 GMT