W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2016 April 13

From: Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:12:14 -0400
Message-ID: <1460567534.12151.24.camel@w3.org>
To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 10:55 -0500, Paul Grosso wrote:
Thought I'd sent regrets, sorry - I had some travel at short notice,
and am now in London for www.libergraphics.org.

Liam

> > Henry pointed out that Section 4.4 references RFC 3023
> > which has been superseded by RFC 7303.  The 7303 rules
> > for determining encoding of XML documents are slightly
> > different from the 3023 ones.
> > 
> > Henry reviewed the consequences to the spec of changing
> > 3023 to 7303 and sent email with suggested rewording at
> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2016Feb/000
3

Shouldn't the respective RFC be followed for a MIME-described resource?

Maybe it's OK, since in practice something like image/tiff (where a BOM
isn't used) isn't going to be included successfully.


> > Norm suggests that we can't force implementations to
> > support [rfc 5147] and that we should clarify the spec to say
> > that lack of support for fragid when parse=text
> > should be a recoverable error.
> > 
> > Henry and Paul agree with that suggestion.
+1

Liam
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 17:12:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 13 April 2016 17:12:20 UTC