- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:54:46 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh writes:
> Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> writes:
>> ...
>> Another possibility is to exclude xml:* attributes from copying, use
>> custom attributes and do any ID corrections on application level.
>
> It's true. xml:lang and xml:base are already handled separately. We
> could say that xml:* attributes are ignored by XInclude attribute
> copying. Not sure how I feel about that.
I'd be very slow to support treating xml:... as a class specially,
particularly without any (difficult to obtain) evidence about existing
usage. . .
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 15 September 2014 09:55:13 UTC