- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:09:03 -0500
- To: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <53A8511F.1060205@paulgrosso.name>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, June 25, from 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka 15:30-16:00 UTC 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. Regrets from David and Henry; Henry gives his proxy to the chair. Henry also gives regrets for July 9. Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. XML Potential Errata -------------------- Comment that "or by the Byte Order Mark" is lacking in section 4.3.3: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2013OctDec/0002 Comment that an entity cannot "begin" with a BOM as suggested in section 4.3.3: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2013OctDec/0003 ACTION to John and Henry: Review and comment on the above two comments on the discussion of BOMs in section 4.3.3 of the XML spec. ---- Comment about documents with an "empty DTD": http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Jan/thread#msg8 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ Henry suggests we could probably make the XML spec clearer here; see also his comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/0004 Paul sent the WG response at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/0005 and there was more back from the commentor at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ ACTION to Henry: Read the post-February 6 email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ and let us know what you think we should do. Submitting XML Schema 1.1 to ISO -------------------------------- See also https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-schema We have decided we will first publish XML Schema 1.1 2E (with approved errata). After that, we would send XML Schema 1.1 2E (only) to ISO. Loren has offered to do the editorial duties, and David talked to CMSMCQ about getting some more help in the details. It looks like there are 3 bugs for Structures, none for Datatypes, but after checking with Michael, he found https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html which shows 8 errata items whereas bugzilla shows only 3. We discussed https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html Henry figures we can just publish this document. Loren still needs to check with Michael that things are appropriately checked in and, if so, we should just push this document through the tool chain and publish. Paul and Loren have pinged Michael, but have not received a useful reply. ACTION to Loren: Take another look at things and suggest a plan on how best to move forward without Michael's feedback. Adding an xs:numeric type to XML Schema --------------------------------------- Norm sent email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014May/0007 asking us what we think of the fact that the XSLT/XQuery WGs are considering adding a new union type to the xs: namespace, xs:numeric which would be a union of decimal, float, and double. Paul sent a reply at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014May/0008 We discussed this on our last telcon; Norm's email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014May/0013 is a summary of the discussion and the latest on the subject to date. Henry has said he is agnostic about this; i.e. if Query want to do this, and no-one objects, no problem. 3. XML Test Suite. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite 4. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri We have planned to issue the following spec editions referencing LEIRIs (and any outstanding errata): * XML 1.0 6th Edition (John to be editor) * XML 1.1 3rd Edition (John to be editor) * XInclude 3rd Edition (Paul to be editor) but all this is on hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. 5. XML Media types (3023bis) See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-media Latest IETF draft was -07 dated February 6 at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-07.html Paul resent a note of support for 3023bis at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Feb/0025 and http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg11494.html There is now a February 23 draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-08 with a diff at http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-08_diff and a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/07-comments.html ...and finally a March 2 draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-09 (I could find no DoC or non-auto diff). [Henry, the first sentence of the last paragraph of section 2.2 includes the phrase "are given names in in [UNICODE]"--note the extra "in".] Paul has sent another WG email of support at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Mar/0003 and http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg11550.html Henry reports that the IESG has tentatively approved the spec. There we many comments made, though none requiring substantive changes. Henry is creating the final draft of the final version. And Wendy Seltzer has acknowledged that the W3C is now the official change controller for all the XML related media type registrations. 6. XInclude 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude On 2012 February 14, we published XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ On 9 October 2012, we published our FPWD of XInclude 1.1 at http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/WD-xinclude-11-20121009/ On 15 January 2013, we published our (first) Last Call of XInclude 1.1 at http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-xinclude-11-20130115/ and Paul sent the transition announcement at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Jan/0012 (also cc-ing the chairs mailing list). On 2013 October 8, we published the XInclude 1.1 CR at http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/ Norm reports that Michael Kay's code just accesses Xerces code, so Norm might have to work with Xerces. DV reports that he is busy and so cannot commit to a deadline for adding XInclude 1.1 support to libxml. ACTION to Norm: Continue to work toward getting XInclude 1.1 implementations and document them in our implementation report. Note also the desire for another test case for the XInclude test suite per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Apr/0000 Norm may see if he knows anyone still working on Xerces. Norm is planning to write a SAX filter to implement XInclude 1.1. He believes this will lead to a way for using XInclude 1.1 with Saxon's XSLT processor and most any other Java based tool. 7. MicroXML MicroXML is not in our new charter, but we can discuss it. We will leave this as an ongoing item in our standing agenda. paul [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014May/0014
Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 16:11:02 UTC